Whitwell is the one that stands out isn't he? Be interesting to see what we do with him next season.
I have my own personal rule - if they don't break through by the time they are 21 they're not going to make it.
It doesn't always apply, obviously, but as a general rule I'll stand by it.
The issue with this is we have traditionally not had lots of managers who want to give youth a chance. We have tended to have had enough funds to have a squad full of known quantities, "solid professionals", whatever you want to call them.
Someone like Finn Azaz didn't make a single first team appearance for us (as far as I am aware without looking), yet he is doing well in the Championship. It's fine to say if they haven't broke into the team by 21 they won't make it, but they also need to be given chances to perform.
Edit:
And to add to this, there's a notion perhaps of kids needing to be ready "now". Take Tom Fellows - actually given a chance by Ismael, but deemed a bit lightweight, and some said he wouldn't make it. Went to a lower division, bided his time, and has looked great.
I read a really interesting article about the NFL draft not long ago that basically said talent evaluators - scouts, managers/coaches etc - consistently over-estimate their ability to judge ability and potential of players. In the NFL, it leads to the wrong players being drafted and bad draft strategy, but I wonder if in football it's more about the players we release at 18, and how we judge who will or won't make it. According to the article the better strategy was to try and gather as many picks as possible to improve the odds of one of them coming off - maybe the strategy formula should be to give more opportunities for players to stay longer, and with a better pathway to the first team.