Author Topic: Ben Foster  (Read 435704 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

slate

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 410
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #75 on: July 07, 2011, 12:49:45 PM »
1 year loan deal haha thats so funny why why why would birmingham loan him to us they want to sell him .


Wages for us are the problem.

bigbadjohn

  • Guest
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #76 on: July 07, 2011, 12:51:13 PM »
this will not happen in a million years,  noway will blues loan him out to us simple . what good would that be for blues ! its stupid .

slate

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 410
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #77 on: July 07, 2011, 12:52:40 PM »
this will not happen in a million years,  noway will blues loan him out to us simple . what good would that be for blues ! its stupid .

Yeah, I am sure that you would know better than the person that I just spoke to.

JDWest_Brom

  • Reserve Baggie

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 1489
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #78 on: July 07, 2011, 12:53:43 PM »
I can't see that happening. What's your source?

The only reason for them to do it would be to get his wages off their wage bill for a season, hoping they get promoted at the first attempt. So he can go back there next year.
Izzy Brown? Yes he is!

Savvas78

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 537
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #79 on: July 07, 2011, 12:53:56 PM »
Quote
Wages for us are the problem.

Maybe. But Peace has stated that the club would pay market value in fees and wages if they felt the player was of adequate quality.
We've gone on holiday by mistake!

slate

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 410
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #80 on: July 07, 2011, 12:59:14 PM »
I can't see that happening. What's your source?

The only reason for them to do it would be to get his wages off their wage bill for a season, hoping they get promoted at the first attempt. So he can go back there next year.

That would make sense. My source is 100% that this move should happen, however there is still work to be done on personal terms and he has not had a medical yet but there should be no problems there. Just gotta sit back and wait now!

Dan

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 6802
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #81 on: July 07, 2011, 01:00:33 PM »
The odds have been like that for a few days which suggests there is nothing in it. Somebody probably just put quiet a large bet on. I remember there being really short odds (might have even stopped taking bets) for beckford a couple of years back, and we didn't even bid for him.

bigbadjohn

  • Guest
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #82 on: July 07, 2011, 01:12:45 PM »
is this a loan to a permenant deal are you saying ? So who told you this then slate Roy hodgson ?

dinkydave2003

  • Reserve Baggie

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 1891
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #83 on: July 07, 2011, 01:17:14 PM »
is this a loan to a permenant deal are you saying ? So who told you this then slate Roy hodgson ?

or the boy with the magic tourch??   :P
When you're sitting on the top, its hard to hear you from way up here.

monkey nuts

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 889
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #84 on: July 07, 2011, 01:28:49 PM »
this will not happen in a million years,  noway will blues loan him out to us simple . what good would that be for blues ! its stupid .

not saying he is right but to say it stupid is in fact stupid itself  ;)

a good keeper is what a lot of teams want (need) so if they could sell others but keep Foster by just loaning him out for a year then if they get promoted they still have a good keeper and if they don't they sell him anyway and they have saved a couple of mill in wages,

win win for Blues i think

dinkydave2003

  • Reserve Baggie

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 1891
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #85 on: July 07, 2011, 01:30:08 PM »
not saying he is right but to say it stupid is in fact stupid itself  ;)

a good keeper is what a lot of teams want (need) so if they could sell others but keep Foster by just loaning him out for a year then if they get promoted they still have a good keeper and if they don't they sell him anyway and they have saved a couple of mill in wages,

win win for Blues i think

stupid is as stupid does!!
When you're sitting on the top, its hard to hear you from way up here.

lordbaggie

  • Reserve Baggie

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 1740
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #86 on: July 07, 2011, 02:01:05 PM »

Axel Foley

  • Guest
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #87 on: July 07, 2011, 02:09:34 PM »

costa blanca baggie

  • Reserve Baggie

  • Online
  • ****

  • 2302
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #88 on: July 07, 2011, 02:44:29 PM »
stupid is as stupid does!!
" Run Foster....run like the wind......" ;D
Humanity is a parade of fools, and I’m at the front of it...twirling the baton.

Astle1968

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 735
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #89 on: July 07, 2011, 05:12:40 PM »

bradleysrocket

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 843
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #90 on: July 07, 2011, 05:14:21 PM »

Astle1968

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 735
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #91 on: July 07, 2011, 05:22:59 PM »
You sound well off........lend us a tenner ;)

Sorry mate, going to use all my spare cash lumping on Nasri to WBA and see how low I can get the odds on that to drop

baggieboy

  • Guest
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #92 on: July 07, 2011, 10:12:36 PM »
ben foster would be good but west brom wont pay the money

BB74

  • Senior Baggie

  • Online
  • *****

  • 4109
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #93 on: July 07, 2011, 10:14:34 PM »
I like lordbaggies idea. Just listened to baggies view though and CL reckons he is not on the radar.

beechyboy90

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 3244
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #94 on: July 07, 2011, 10:19:18 PM »
is he really on that much money?
O Albion we love you

Mulumbu99

  • Guest
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #95 on: July 07, 2011, 10:19:58 PM »
foster isn't even a target....

slate

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 410
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #96 on: July 07, 2011, 10:23:18 PM »
is he really on that much money?

How much money do you think he's on?

BB74

  • Senior Baggie

  • Online
  • *****

  • 4109
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #97 on: July 07, 2011, 10:34:45 PM »
A tweet from CL 4 minutes ago claiming there might now be an interest in Ben Foster.  :)

'But seems there might now be an interest'

'Not as advanced as being stated. But seems missing out on Given has forced a rethink. Hence DV's revaluation'.

'And all of a sudden wba 's decision to not pursue Vaughan is starting to make sense....'
« Last Edit: July 07, 2011, 10:44:13 PM by BB74 »

blandyisabaggie

  • Guest
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #98 on: July 07, 2011, 10:41:54 PM »
He would be so good. I think hes a class goalie

Ogwani

  • Guest
Re: Ben Foster
« Reply #99 on: July 07, 2011, 10:50:10 PM »
something's going downnnn  :P