Useful insight into the mindset of the National Media. A few points emerge
1. A team that finished 10th and 11th over the last two seasons were completely off their radar and unless we are playing one of the glamour clubs e.g. Liverpool most of them would have hardly covered one of our games.
2. Obsessed with the cult of the Manager it is all about Clarke good or bad.
3. Have not grasped the way the Albion recruit players they always portray it as a bit of a slight on the Head Coach.
Same old balls as per usual but at least they acknowledged they were probably wrong at the outset although as I have said before only three games in so it all could still go belly up and if it does we will no doubt have to suffer the "yes we were right about the Albion all along" video in January.
And this is exactly the problem.
If the players we currently have are capable players, with the capabilities of collectively producing a top ten/mid-table finish, then why would they suddenly lose those capabilities with a managerial change? I can't understand how a different head coach - yes a head coach; not a manager - coming in, who has made small but effective changes to our style of play, would disrupt our league momentum.
I know I'm not being very clear with what I'm trying to say, but neither are these pundits. It's the same excuse every time - Steve Clarke has never managed before and therefore WBA might be relegated. I see no logic in that argument and they have done absolutely no research on Steve Clarke as a person either. He wasn't a typical 'yes man' No. 2 when he was an assistant; he was always a hands on, interactive coach who liked to take coaching sessions; he was perfect for our system, which most pundits don't seem to understand.
They're all ignorant. The lot of 'em.