I disagree, Curbishley's brand of football is every bit as functional, and some may say stifling, as Hodgson's style if not more so.
I also doubt he would be interested in working in our structure, he would view it as a constraint to his management style. I would be seriously disappointed of we were to go for him.
I have complete faith in the club getting it right, the last few appointments have been spot on.
He won't have a choice in what structure he works in as all clubs are going the same way especially with the financial fair play restrictions being introduced. I would have agreed with your point a few years ago but those days are gone now.
I wasn't saying Curbishley's brand of football was on par with Brazil or a Mowbray team, but he does employ a slightly more attacking brand than Hodgson in my opinion, not that I have a problem with Hodgson style, at the end of the day we can play like Stoke every week and be bored to tears, as long as we win, that's all I care about. We can start thinking about expansive attractive football when we can sign the players to do so and still survive year after year.
Answer me this mate (not having a go, everyone has got different ideas on who's the best man for the job):
What part of Curbishleys managerial record suggests to you that he couldn't come to the Hawthorns and carry on consolidating our Prem status?