Author Topic: Jake Livermore  (Read 468686 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

beechyboy90

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4106
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2025 on: January 10, 2022, 06:07:30 PM »
Whether ot not he is a nice guy aint the point its whether or not he should be in our midfield or a wba player come summer.

Personally i think we should move on summer but VI likes him so whats the odds on an extension.

Having said that the last few games he has been one of our better players
O Albion we love you

smethwickw

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4882
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2026 on: January 10, 2022, 06:29:07 PM »
Did you tackle him over his poor technique when you had the opportunity or did you take a pass on that one  ;D ?

Passed on that one but I do remember telling Carlton Palmer he was rubbish at a Junior Baggie event once.  :D
赖国传, 滚出我们的俱乐部    = Lai Guochuan, get out of our club

GREGMT

  • Reserve Baggie

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 1228
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2027 on: January 15, 2022, 06:49:23 PM »
Once again the Manager picked Livermore in CM, Furlong CB and Gardner Hickman RB. 

Surely the better choice would've been Livermore CB, Furlong RB, Gardner Hickman CM.

As far back as September i was stating nothing was created centrally.

Ismael is just not very sharp IMO.


paulosull

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4745
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2028 on: January 15, 2022, 08:02:50 PM »
Offers nothing to the team so don’t understand why he gets a starting berth week in week out.

Aztech

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4135
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2029 on: January 15, 2022, 08:08:36 PM »
Offers nothing to the team so don’t understand why he gets a starting berth week in week out.

Livermore is poor, however the same could be said of numerous players.
Our squad isn’t good enough to replace them all.
It is not the taking part, but the winning that counts.

seteefeet

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4089
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2030 on: January 15, 2022, 08:31:46 PM »
Don't know what the xg is but he must have broken the world record, this season, for balls kicked over his own head.

zippyandbungle

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 5864
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2031 on: January 15, 2022, 08:34:55 PM »
Proved to me he's a caring guy with giving his private box to a young kid last week
Don't forget he's been through difficult times in his personnel family life.
David Jason seems a nice bloke,what size boots does he need?
If youre going to get told off, get told off for doing something not for doing nothing..

liverbaggie

  • Reserve Baggie

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 2254
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2032 on: January 16, 2022, 12:22:00 PM »
Wonder exactly where our fools are and our horses, don't tell me let me guess!

zippyandbungle

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 5864
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2033 on: January 16, 2022, 02:48:29 PM »
Wonder exactly where our fools are and our horses, don't tell me let me guess!
Guess away.
We can laud how nice players are, but is that really what we sign them for?
Many people think zlatan is a bit rogue, Ronaldo seems cocky,but they are winners .
If youre going to get told off, get told off for doing something not for doing nothing..

baggie82

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4140
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2034 on: January 16, 2022, 03:12:13 PM »
Once again the Manager picked Livermore in CM, Furlong CB and Gardner Hickman RB. 

Surely the better choice would've been Livermore CB, Furlong RB, Gardner Hickman CM.

As far back as September i was stating nothing was created centrally.

Ismael is just not very sharp IMO.

Agree with your preference Gregg, I think that would have suited us better yesterday, getting TGH in midfield should be a priority in my opinion.

beechyboy90

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4106
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2035 on: January 16, 2022, 08:09:37 PM »
Once again the Manager picked Livermore in CM, Furlong CB and Gardner Hickman RB. 

Surely the better choice would've been Livermore CB, Furlong RB, Gardner Hickman CM.

As far back as September i was stating nothing was created centrally.

Ismael is just not very sharp IMO.

Correct played all 3 in wrong spots.
Central midfield was horrific yesterday however i think Livermore was better than mulumby who just seemed to hoof the ball whenever he got it.

Both spent the entire second half chasing balls kicked over their heads
O Albion we love you

TAFKATMNo1Fan

  • Reserve Baggie

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 1445
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2036 on: January 19, 2022, 08:01:31 AM »
1 year extension confirmed

KYA

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 5779
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2037 on: January 19, 2022, 08:02:15 AM »
You will all be glad to know he has triggered a 1 yr contract extension he will be here next season  >:(

Hull Baggie

  • Global Moderator
  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 7187
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2038 on: January 19, 2022, 08:07:07 AM »
I'm not anti Livermore and know he's nowhere near as bad as some paint him but it's a poor decision, we needed to let him go and replace with younger/better at the end of the season.

Hopefully in the next window we can get in a better option and Livermore will be an off the bench option, like Brunt was when he was nearing the end of his time with us.
Dexy : LiamTheBaggie : MarkW : OldburyWBA
Adder : Hull Baggie : lewisant : Political Cake : tommcneill

Mooncat

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 790
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2039 on: January 19, 2022, 08:28:21 AM »
Also important to factor in, it could just be that we use that to get some money for him when moving him on rather than (another) free

gazberg

  • WBA Manager

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 17154
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2040 on: January 19, 2022, 08:30:10 AM »
What on earth  :o

gazberg

  • WBA Manager

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 17154
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2041 on: January 19, 2022, 08:31:43 AM »
Also important to factor in, it could just be that we use that to get some money for him when moving him on rather than (another) free

Why would he leave?

Atomic

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 5921
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2042 on: January 19, 2022, 08:34:21 AM »
Re-signing the likes of Phillips and Livermore just sums the club up at the moment. What do we have to do to get rid of aging, serial mediocrity like these two?

If I freeze my body when I die and come back to life in 150 years time these two will probably still be at the club.

Will we ever learn?

KYA

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 5779
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2043 on: January 19, 2022, 08:49:46 AM »

seteefeet

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4089
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2044 on: January 19, 2022, 08:49:57 AM »
Terrible decision, he has no sell on value so this means he'll hang around and probably still be first name on the team sheet.
We won't truly improve until we start moving on these past their sell by, bang average performers.

AlbionFan

  • Site Donator
  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 5259
赖国传, 滚出我们的俱乐部

Beware of Speculation! = the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence.

gazberg

  • WBA Manager

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 17154
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2046 on: January 19, 2022, 08:53:03 AM »
Who the hell gives a midfielder coming to the end of his career a 1 year extension on top of the 4 guaranteed???

We have some buffoons running this club.

Baltic

  • Junior Baggie

  • Offline
  • **

  • 102
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2047 on: January 19, 2022, 08:54:28 AM »
Re-signing the likes of Phillips and Livermore just sums the club up at the moment. What do we have to do to get rid of aging, serial mediocrity like these two?

If I freeze my body when I die and come back to life in 150 years time these two will probably still be at the club.

Will we ever learn?

Could not agree more.  This is typical of a club in decline.  Offering long-term contracts to players who have no upside value, absorb massive wages and have a limited positive input to the team.  I know its a one year extension for Livermore, but the previous 4 years was already ridiculous (as was the fee).

In Val's formation (2 midfielders) you cannot afford midfielders who can only defend.  They have to be creative too, otherwise you don't create chances and hence you don't score.... sound familiar?

I think he should be a back up CB until his contract expires. I'd try to move him out on a free in the summer but I doubt we'll get any takers.   What a waste of resources!

gazberg

  • WBA Manager

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 17154
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2048 on: January 19, 2022, 08:56:03 AM »
Assuming he's extended on his current terms. No one will offer him what we have.

Any chance to not have to replace someone and this club will take it regardless of what value the player will offer the club down the road.

Atomic

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 5921
Re: Jake Livermore
« Reply #2049 on: January 19, 2022, 08:58:29 AM »
Unless I'm getting it all wrong it's a clause that JL has triggered not the club.
https://www.expressandstar.com/sport/football/west-bromwich-albion/2022/01/19/west-brom-captain-jake-livermore-triggers-one-year-contract-extension/

He shouldn't have had an option to trigger in the first place.