0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I think that unless we replace Harvey with someone of real quality, we should persevere with our own youngsters. There is absolutely no point in bringing in people like Giles Barnes, who was next to useless first time round.
Giles Barnes was totally useless first time round agreed,last time he played for us we were 3 nil up at home to West Ham and cruising,Barnes was on the bench,i think it may have been Appleton in charge we were in total command with 25 mins to go he bought Barnes on,it was like playing with 10 men,west ham scored 3 times and it ended up 3-3 ,I don't think he ever played again
I know it has "Barnes" in the title, but can we keep the talk about the nightmare inducing Giles variety of Barnes to a different thread and not the Harvey Barnes one.... every time I see something is posted in here my eyes light up hoping that we've managed to prise Harvey back off Leicester until the end of the season
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/west-brom-hope-re-sign-13910137.amp?__twitter_impression=trueRumours that Barnes is on his way back. Thoughts that hes stepped up too quickly.
I have a Leicester supporting mate who is generally very well informed and he said that he was brought back to Leicester for them to have a look at and then loaned back to us again dependent on his improvement and game time. With his goal and performance I would suggest that this might have counted against us.
Leicester City's Harvey Barnes won't return to West BromPity.Source: https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/leicester-citys-harvey-barnes-wont-2473999
Puel has dropped Barnes for tonight's trip to Anfield. Surely we're in with a shout of him coming back? Which I imagine is delaying the Murphy deal.
He's on a pretty strong bench.
Lads, can we keep talk on other games in the Premiership thread in General Sports forum please
I was having a conversation with Jacko about Harvey Barnes playing for Leicester tonight, relative to the possibility of him coming back to us. Surely relevant to the topic?