Author Topic: Jay Rodriguez Joins Burnley  (Read 364217 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SmethDan

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 8563
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #775 on: March 07, 2018, 12:28:10 PM »
Have I missed the decision?
Why's it taking so long?
Its affecting his play?
Does this joker Bong just want some publicity back home?
Its one mans word against the other,so no contest.
There should be time limits on this type of accusation,say 48 hours.

No.

The case was deferred until March 9th.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43079270
It doesn't matter how many resources you have.
If you don't know how to use them, they will never be enough.
Oh, and always remember to defecate on those Vile chaps in claret and spew.

MarkW

  • Administrator
  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 6432
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #776 on: March 07, 2018, 12:44:29 PM »
On FIFA Rodríguez is a Left Midfielder and Judging by the Way he plays he Should be on the Left He would give Pace and Assist but due to the way we've being Playing he has to either Go higher up and played out of his position Credit For J rod though he has given some Key goals albeit meaning Jack rubbish at the end of it

I wouldn't say playing up front is playing him out of position. He has alternated between the two throughout his career.

He played left wing the season he ruptured his ligaments, and but since has largely played as a centre forward.

His performances on the left for us haven't been as good in my opinion
Dexy : LiamTheBaggie : MarkW : OldburyWBA
Adder : Hull Baggie : lewisant : Political Cake : tommcneill

He/him

SmethDan

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 8563
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #777 on: March 07, 2018, 01:08:56 PM »
I wouldn't say playing up front is playing him out of position. He has alternated between the two throughout his career.

He played left wing the season he ruptured his ligaments, and but since has largely played as a centre forward.

His performances on the left for us haven't been as good in my opinion

Basing your opinion on what you've actually seen is clearly where you're going wrong.

In fact I think we should completely dump the The Scouting Department, The Monitoring Department, The F'ing About Department and the Stalking Department and do all of our recruiting via FIFA.

Clearly better, more efficient and best of all in the mind of Mr Jenkins (allegedly) is that it would also be cheaper.

Why lash out sponds on scouting etc when you can just switch the telly on, put your feet up and let your hands do all of the 'work' with that there 'joystick' thingy like 04 appears to.

It's all in the wrist apparently  ;D  ;) .
It doesn't matter how many resources you have.
If you don't know how to use them, they will never be enough.
Oh, and always remember to defecate on those Vile chaps in claret and spew.

Fritzl Palace

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4663
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #778 on: March 07, 2018, 02:03:52 PM »
I stopped reading as soon as he used 'Rodriguez' and 'pace' in the same sentence.

liverbaggie

  • Reserve Baggie

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 2254
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #779 on: March 09, 2018, 01:05:07 PM »
By the way good luck to jrod today at his hearing.

don1thedon

  • Site Donator
  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 381
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #780 on: March 09, 2018, 04:53:37 PM »
"The case will now be heard by a disciplinary panel at a date to be decided .... West Brom manager Alan Pardew said he does not expect the matter to be resolved soon."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43350597

TheJacko2000

  • WBA Manager

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 14690
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #781 on: April 10, 2018, 11:09:18 PM »
Hearing tomorrow. Final nail for this season?


A guilty verdict leaves a club with our history a big decision to make.  He'd have to be terminated imo.


Hopefully he is exonerated.
Proud to be a Baggie. BOING BOING.

timdon

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 2749
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #782 on: April 10, 2018, 11:48:07 PM »
Hearing tomorrow. Final nail for this season?


A guilty verdict leaves a club with our history a big decision to make.  He'd have to be terminated imo.


Hopefully he is exonerated.
Yep, agree with both these sentiments. If it goes against him his reputation will be in tatters, but fingers crossed it won't come to that

Fritzl Palace

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4663
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #783 on: April 11, 2018, 10:07:38 AM »
Fingers crossed for exoneration. He is actually starting to find the net on a fairly regular basis now and would be a decent striker to have in the league below.

VANDERLEI

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4482
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #784 on: April 11, 2018, 02:04:56 PM »
He's innocent of the accusations whether the jokers at the FA find him guilty or not. The club should back him regardless of what the outcome is. I'm no lip reader but it was plain to see that he didn't say what Bong had accused him of. He was just drunk off that he forgot to brush his teeth that morning and had been called out on it.

Wigmore

  • Junior Baggie

  • Offline
  • **

  • 232
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #785 on: April 11, 2018, 10:05:02 PM »
Why is it going to take 3 weeks for a decision???
Justice delayed is justice denied.

BAGGIE5

  • Youth Baggie

  • Online
  • ***

  • 662
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #786 on: April 12, 2018, 07:54:10 PM »
Wasn’t the verdict meant to be today?

TheJacko2000

  • WBA Manager

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 14690
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #787 on: April 13, 2018, 04:22:21 PM »
CLEARED.


Pleased for the lad. Important these allegations are taken seriously though so hopefully there won't be a ridiculous backlash against Bong from our fans in particular.
Proud to be a Baggie. BOING BOING.

Atomic

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 5921
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #788 on: April 13, 2018, 04:27:31 PM »
It's a shame he wasn't exonerated rather than the charge being not proven.

Still, he's in the clear that's the bottom line.

pennington

  • Baby Baggie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 84
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #789 on: April 13, 2018, 04:28:22 PM »
So the other bloke needs to be charged then ......... obious they now think he is a liar.

Atomic

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 5921
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #790 on: April 13, 2018, 04:29:45 PM »
So the other bloke needs to be charged then ......... obious they now think he is a liar.


According to the FA Bong made the accusation in "Good faith". Make of that what you will.

TheJacko2000

  • WBA Manager

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 14690
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #791 on: April 13, 2018, 04:32:59 PM »
So the other bloke needs to be charged then ......... obious they now think he is a liar.


Unreal. What should he be charged with? I'll wait...
Proud to be a Baggie. BOING BOING.

Aztech

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4135
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #792 on: April 13, 2018, 04:36:42 PM »

Unreal. What should he be charged with? I'll wait...

character assassination
It is not the taking part, but the winning that counts.

TheJacko2000

  • WBA Manager

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 14690
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #793 on: April 13, 2018, 04:37:43 PM »
character assassination


Don't believe that is an FA charge. Or remotely true in this case.
Proud to be a Baggie. BOING BOING.

bradleysrocket

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 974
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #794 on: April 13, 2018, 04:41:50 PM »
I believe he could have acted better, but there is no reason to believe bong did it maliciously. Just a ‘lost in translation’ type of issue.

adamw1109

  • Youth Baggie

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 474
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #795 on: April 13, 2018, 04:42:18 PM »
Any blind man could see he didn't say anything racist.

Just another typical example of bell*nds throwing the race card around because they feel like it.

Fritzl Palace

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4663
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #796 on: April 13, 2018, 04:56:08 PM »
Great news.

Hopefully he can be a big player for us next season.

royhan

  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 5469
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #797 on: April 13, 2018, 04:56:59 PM »
Justice is done

paulosull

  • Senior Baggie

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 4745
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #798 on: April 13, 2018, 05:15:51 PM »
Good news for Jay but should never have been sent to disciplinary board

WorcsWBA

  • Site Donator
  • WBA Coach

  • Offline
  • *****

  • 5481
Re: Jay Rodriguez
« Reply #799 on: April 13, 2018, 05:16:25 PM »
It's a shame he wasn't exonerated rather than the charge being not proven.
It's probably the case that they couldn't see Jay's mouth on camera for then entire duration of the incident and, as obviously no-one else heard anything, it came down to one person against another. As there was no absolute proof of either guilt or innocence, a verdict of not proven would be inevitable. It's quite possible that Bong misinterpreted something that Jay said.

I'm pleased for Jay that he's not been found guilty, although it's a shame that it's taken so long for the outcome to be arrived at. Fair play to Alan Pardew for going along to support him.