Good thread. For me, homophobic abuse is every bit as hurtful as racist abuse. In the 80s when attitudes on the monkey chants and bans throwing started to change, some fans used the same arguments I am seeing here. In summary these are: it's just a bit of fun or that people need to have a thicker skin. Anyone needs to be comfortable coming to match. Interesting thought. How many great black and Asian players did not play professionally because of abuse? Are we happy if we put off the next great England players just because they are gay? I for one am not.
Some good points. Like yourself, I don't feel it's right to use something about someone's body or beliefs as an excuse to abuse someone. I think banter between friends is fine, as long as everyone is cool with it. But I realise we live in an age where anyone overhearing comments made in public has the right to challenge.
My main issue is why is it important? Who a footballer (or anyone else for that matter) sleeps with or does what ever with, is nothing to do with me and doesn't change my views about their sporting abilities. I don't look more favourably upon a player because he is known for bedding lots of women. It really makes no difference to me, so why should someone's sexual preference? Yet it's all we seem to hear about. I guess I just wondered if anyone felt the same as me - I have no problem with LGBT, just the amount I'm told I have to be more accepting (I do accept others) and less abusive (I'm not abusive)...
On the flip side, I appreciate some forms of abuse can be linked to geography. Such as the Glasgow derby. It's very religious-based and there is a deep hatred because of this. Yet, I'm not sure football fans go to The Hawthorns thinking "I'm going to abuse Robert Koren because he's a devout Catholic" or something.
Not intended as a rant...can you tell I've had a day of kids being rude and disrespectful to me? lol.