The Independant journalist Jack Pitt-Brooke makes an interesting point on his twitter.
At Swansea, Rodgers succeeded Paulo Sousa who played a very similar style. At Reading, he succeeded Coppell who didn't. He has been a success at Swansea but failed at Reading.
If that means he is better at continuing and improving something that is already in place, but not so good at changing the way a team plays, what does that mean for Liverpool?
Is Dalglish similar to Rodgers or different? I dont think Dalglish is a long ball merchant but he is not a continental style manager either. Rodgers is an interesting appointment but hard to say if it is the right one.