Let's look at the background again:
1) Peace gets rid of a head coach who, if this forum and others where polls took place are anything to go by, the majority of fans wanted to stay on this season.
2) A new head coach is appointed who you'd be hard pushed to find anyone at all who wanted him to be appointed.
3) The way the fixtures fell meant that we needed to hit the ground running at the start of the season.
Based on the above, there was never going to be a honeymoon period. 6 games in and we've scored 3 times (1 of which was an own goal) and have 2 points to show for it, plus a penalties win, over a side that was bottom of League 2 at the time, that could easily have gone the other way.
Therefore, the reactions here, and what is a festering atmosphere at the ground, come as no surprise. In these circumstances, it was vital that Irvine did something to try to win the fans over, but he has made no attempt to do this and has just adopted a fearful approach which has made him reluctant to play our most creative players, whilst the remaining old guard, who have presided over an increasingly horrible run of what must now be something like 12 wins in our last 75 games, still hold sway.
"He's a great coach....": as I've said previously, this has to manifest itself in some way, otherwise what does it matter? What's actually getting better under his tenure, as a result of him being such a great coach? Where's the evidence of it?
Peace would be very brave to pull the trigger so soon, as it would be an admittance of a massive failure on his part which, as he would see it, would be the second failure in a row. However, I'm fearful that, if Irvine was sacked, we would just end up with Downing and Kiely until the end of the season.
Ultimately, something has to change, because the approach we're currently taking in matches is not working and we must do something different. If Irvine won't do it, then let's have a big clear out on the coaching side and let someone else have a go.