1
West Bromwich Albion FC / Full Backs - Do we need them or not?
« on: January 10, 2016, 11:44:14 AM »
Since Pulis has arrived there has been plenty of talk about full backs. The lack of game time for Wisdom, Davidson, Pocognoli and Gamboa has caused much discussion, particularly as we messed around with Lescott, Baird, etc filling in.
We have arrived at a point where Dawson and Brunt are our regular options have been for the best part of a year, but with January coming up there is a lot of talk that we need to invest in 'natural' full backs.
I suppose the big question is, given how those two have performed over that period, so we need new full backs? I personally think we could do with some cover, but I don't mind having both as our recognised options going forward. After struggling early on I think both have really got to grips with it. I think a 'natural' full back is a bit of a myth anyway. It's a position with such varied demands, most full backs struggle either offensively or defensively in some way. I think Dawson and Brunt do as good a job as most on this league and certainly in our PL sides, but I'm interested to see what others think?
We have arrived at a point where Dawson and Brunt are our regular options have been for the best part of a year, but with January coming up there is a lot of talk that we need to invest in 'natural' full backs.
I suppose the big question is, given how those two have performed over that period, so we need new full backs? I personally think we could do with some cover, but I don't mind having both as our recognised options going forward. After struggling early on I think both have really got to grips with it. I think a 'natural' full back is a bit of a myth anyway. It's a position with such varied demands, most full backs struggle either offensively or defensively in some way. I think Dawson and Brunt do as good a job as most on this league and certainly in our PL sides, but I'm interested to see what others think?