I have no idea what Livermore was or is supposed to do. Stupid thing is we missed him against Derby and I have no idea why. Huddlestone was the one we should have taken from Hull.
I used to rate Livermore when was at spurs, but he has been hit and miss for us. It maybe that is because he has been overrun and is being asked to do the running of whoever less mobile is next to him. Huddlestone did a very good job protecting the Derby back 4 when they played us, but he is in his mid 30's now too.
The one we should have paid the fee for imo, was McCarthy at everton when we were supposed to be in for him, and where once we would have taken surplus players at the vile like KP, Shorey and Ridgewell, we overlooked the dynamic Idissa Gueye who would have given us youth and energy in the mf.
Our recruitment and decision making has been shocking for a number of years now, since the scatter gun purchasing frenzy that brought in Blanco, Davidson and Samaras and co.
The rumour was that Shakespeare bid £25m for Livermore, and we rejected that offer too. I like what Dowling is saying regarding not being afraid to sell and being confident of finding a good replacement.
It is shocking the once in a lifetime bids we have rejected for Rondon and co.
There was no leadership there to accept the bids despite the noises made from pulis to reject the bids.