I think he's a fantastic player, if you see him it's not just the goals, he's vital for the way they play on the counter and creates a lot too.
Anyway, for those on here saying "we've always lacked ambition". What exactly does that mean? The fanbase, the owner, the ground?!
It means we haven't hit the jackpot and got a sugar daddy in. Otherwise we're just a typical football club like the rest of them. I remember when Fulham went into the Europa league with Al-Fayed who funded them at one time. Does that mean they're an 'ambitious' club, or does it simply mean they had an absurdly wealthy owner at that time?
It does not mean having a sugar daddy, and it doesn't mean spending lots of money. There is no reason that the team under Hodgson, Clarke, etc could not have seriously tried for a cup if motivated enough. But they weren't.
We simply don't desire to be more than we are, once we are in the Premier. Fulham had that money, but it wasn't enough for them to just be in the division, and so they pushed themselves and got Europe. We don't do that, even when we have a sound base to launch off. When we finished 8th, we still didn't show any ambition to try and secure that kind of finish on a regular basis, and we were 17th the following year.
It's not about spending lots of money, it's about aspiring to more than just existing.
Rochdale can have an ambitions to reach the Championship. It might take them clever management on their budget and good recruitment, but what is football if you can't dream of being better and achieving more?