I might be missing something and I admit I know very little about him but why is Dean Smith being held in such high regard?
Brentford might play a decent style of football but they have blown the chance of the play offs (again), went out of the FA cup in 3rd round at home to League 2 Notts County and the 3rd round of the league cup at home to Norwich. He has a win percentage of 39 (38.8%) and has lost and won 47 games out of 121. Doesn't sound that good to me.
All this is from this season but surely that's what we should be judging managers on, how they have most recently performed?
Took Walsall to 4th in the league and Wembley cup final on a very low budget and by developing kids e.g. some of our ex kids such as Sam Mantom. Did this by building and rebuilding teams after selling his better players regularly and having to rely on much cheaper replacements.
Took Brentford to mid table finishes again on a very small budget and by having to build and rebuild teams following sales for large fees.
Has a reputation for coaching players to better performances and particularly developing youngsters.
Has served an apprenticeship as a manager in the lower leagues and now Championship.
All with a philosophy for trying to play through midfield.
These are my perceptions as to why he’d be up there as a candidate.
The one big thing you’d need to judge after meeting him or any other candidate is their attitude, energy, desire to improve the club and to buy into it as a project for example. We need to move away from people like Pulis, allardyce, Pardew etc... who’s experience hides the fact they’re not coming to us to build anything sustainable but to fight fires and to make a short term buck for the club and themselves!