I think in this league you can play one or the other of Brunt or Livermore in centre midfield, not both.
I would go for Livermore as thats his natural position and at least you know he is on the pitch, i think he can sit in and pass a ball, but for many periods Brunt goes missing.
Regardless of if you pick one of the two, its who you play alongside them that will make us tick, we need that player who gets about the opposition, breaks play up, but gets into the box too and just takes the game by the scruff of the neck.
One time in the first half, think Phillips crossed it and neither Brunt or Livermore were anymore near the box, not making a breaking run as it just isnt their game, i feel a bit for Brunty as i said a few years ago i could see the appeal in trying him as a quarter back style player but he would need the right player alongside him, and Livermore isnt that player, which Brunt looking a bit lost, slow and confused without really being able to do what he does best, cross or playing bending passes.
The last player we had who was box to box like that was Mulumbu and him in his prime would be great.
As for Brunt, i would put him at left back, again not sure if he was quite upto premier league standard there as he switched off a lot but we arent premier league anymore and i think he would do a good job, his crosses are still good and he is one of the few players we have who can open up the opposition.
Gibbs tonight looked very half hearted and Forest kept switching the play to the flanks against him and Tosin (wont even attempt the surname) the other side, they had clearly identified a weakness, didnt help that we made a decent at best championship midfielder like Guardlene look like Pirlo for the night by letting him spray those passes.