I don’t think anyone says he’s beyond criticism. It’s just some people on here don’t like to listen to an argument opposite to their own. I don’t mean you by the way
I honestly wouldn’t be offended if you did.
There seems to be some on here that will defend the manager regardless ,and if anyone offers fair criticism they get shot down with
It’s Lai’s fault
It’s Pearce’s fault
He’s not Bruce or Val
He’s had no money
But the real truth is he hasn’t (so far) shown that he has a plan b or c
He has shown some stubborn and quite frankly daft tendencies to make the same subs at the same times in almost every match .
He has apparently bombed almost all of the new signings
He has benefited from having some decisions made for him (McNair last night)
And his insistence on playing his mate even if it is for 1 minute is just ludicrous
Those that say he is better than any recent incumbent I don’t agree
Over the last 5 matches I believe Billic would have gained more points ,We would not have lost vs Weds/Boro under Allardyce and I’m pretty bloody certain with Pullis in the dugout 1-0 at Ixford stays 1-0 at Oxford.
I don’t have any money on Corberan being sacked,I’d much rather he saw what most can see with their eyes ,but I most definitely am not going to just agree that he’s fine and we should stick with him regardless,for the money he is in and the position he is in…he should at least be made to answer the question
**what could you possibly be thinking could happen by bringing Wallace in with 1 minute of added time to go
?