Author Topic: New Kit/ Sponsors (Read 314830 times)

PsalmXXIII · « **Reply #50 on:** May 06, 2016, 06:11:41 PM »

http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/west-bromwich-albion-fc/2016/05/06/new-albion-kit-revealed-by-female-dance-troupe-in-birmingham/flash-kit-pic-3/

Express and Dingle has a slightly better view of it.

telford baggie · « **Reply #51 on:** May 06, 2016, 06:15:23 PM »

dont like the sky blue stripes down the side

PsalmXXIII · « **Reply #52 on:** May 06, 2016, 06:31:43 PM »

Looks alright to me. Different in person isn't it. Sponsors a bit pooh.

KnaveofAlbion · « **Reply #53 on:** May 06, 2016, 06:32:44 PM »

Sky blue stripes?

What on Earth do the designers think?

Another one not brought.....

The Black Pearl · « **Reply #54 on:** May 06, 2016, 06:35:07 PM »

I like it, traditional with a twist, great launch as well.

TheJacko2000 · « **Reply #55 on:** May 06, 2016, 06:36:49 PM »

The Adidas 3 stripes are indeed pale blue but it looks a smart way to separate the navy blue and white stripes from the solid white back.

I like it.

lewisant · « **Reply #56 on:** May 06, 2016, 06:37:59 PM »

The shirt looks really nice and that's a pretty cool way to reveal a new kit

sing on our own · « **Reply #57 on:** May 06, 2016, 07:00:29 PM »

As long as it's blue and white stripes (not pinstripes) I'm not over fussed it's who's going to be wearing it on the pitch I'm worried about.

OldburyWBA · « **Reply #58 on:** May 06, 2016, 07:07:47 PM »

Don't like the sky blue stripes, don't like the yellow and black training kit, the sooner Adidas do one the better hopefully this year will be the last year and we don't extend the deal.

beechyboy90 · « **Reply #59 on:** May 06, 2016, 07:21:05 PM »

White back is horrible. Think Adidas have only managed to do us 2/5 good kits. I want Umbro back

caravanc58 · « **Reply #60 on:** May 06, 2016, 07:50:39 PM »

http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/West_Bromwich_Albion/West_Bromwich_Albion.htm

plenty on here we could do that are better than the rubbish adidas come up with.
can still see Richard sneekes in tat 96-97 shirt.

OldburyWBA · « **Reply #61 on:** May 06, 2016, 07:52:15 PM »

caravanc58 · « **Reply #62 on:** May 06, 2016, 07:54:29 PM »

Quote from: OldburyWBA on May 06, 2016, 07:52:15 PM

what a mess.

M666EYS · « **Reply #63 on:** May 06, 2016, 08:03:03 PM »

Quote from: caravanc58 on May 06, 2016, 07:54:29 PM

what a mess.

The bird or the shirt?

caravanc58 · « **Reply #64 on:** May 06, 2016, 08:18:50 PM »

Quote from: M666EYS on May 06, 2016, 08:03:03 PM

The bird or the shirt?

cant see her face mate but she would have to be pig ugly to look worse than that shirt front.

alwaysbilly · « **Reply #65 on:** May 06, 2016, 08:42:15 PM »

Quote from: PsalmXXIII on May 06, 2016, 06:31:43 PM

Looks alright to me. Different in person isn't it. Sponsors a bit pooh.

Looks great much better and stylish than red trim.

Hope the away kit is as nice.

Tony Goddens Gloves · « **Reply #66 on:** May 06, 2016, 08:44:25 PM »

I will say well done to the club to launch it the way we did
Centre of Brum, rush hour and hitting home the pour we are the ONLY team in town in the Prem ðŸ˜œ Hopefully on sale soon for the start of the summer

costa blanca baggie · « **Reply #67 on:** May 06, 2016, 10:21:50 PM »

The sky blue sides are bad enough, but the collar?

glosterbaggie · « **Reply #68 on:** May 06, 2016, 10:34:30 PM »

The back is taken up by a number and name? Looks ok otherwise.

teaguey · « **Reply #69 on:** May 06, 2016, 11:50:09 PM »

Sky blue and yellow away kit?

Just like the 90's!

Droitwich Baggie · « **Reply #70 on:** May 07, 2016, 12:09:49 AM »

So, with a white back, it means that a lot of away teams will have to change their strip. Also it will mean that we can't play in it against teams who basically wear white (spuds etc.)
Keep shelling out lads, for new strips, in other words !

Floydy · « **Reply #71 on:** May 07, 2016, 06:52:44 AM »

I think it looks fine. I know im in the minority but I prefer the white back. The sky blue detailing is a different twist. The sponsor does look terrible though.

I think doing the launch this early is great and doing it at Grand Central was a novel and discussion provoking idea that has got people talking.

Does anybody know if this is a one-off design or whether its an identikit template that other clubs are using?

kris_boing · « **Reply #72 on:** May 07, 2016, 07:11:12 AM »

I like it. Don't mind the light blue trim at all. It looks like a typical Adidas strip.

Not keen on these Asian betting logos but it seems that we are pushing things in the east to try and get investment.

I'll be amazed if we don't get sold to a asian/eastern buyer pretty soon.

WorcsWBA · « **Reply #73 on:** May 07, 2016, 07:50:17 AM »

In my view the hideous sponsor's logo and unbalancing plain white back makes this shirt as ugly as the club is generally perceived as being these days.

charlebaggie · « **Reply #74 on:** May 07, 2016, 09:22:46 AM »

Quote from: WorcsWBA on May 07, 2016, 07:50:17 AM

In my view the hideous sponsor's logo and unbalancing plain white back makes this shirt as ugly as the club is generally perceived as being these days.

. Never ever satisfied some folk,what would you like ? Pink and white stripe with fluffy collars . We've gone back to an original design with a broader stripe away from the thin pinstripe everyone hated and still the club can't do right .