I'm amazed there would even be a debate as to wether Bruce should stay or not. He's done absolutely nothing here, or in general over the last 5 years to show he should be anywhere near our dugout next season.
When some managers come in, I'm willing to give them time depending on what they are trying to achieve. For example, you can have your opinions on Ismael, but it's clear he had a plan and style he was trying to implement. I have absolutely no idea what Bruce is trying to do with us. As a side are we defensive, attacking, counter attacking, possession based, high tempo... I genuinely don't have a clue.
Theres much bigger problems than Bruce at the club as we all know, however that doesn't mean he shouldn't still be gone in the summer regardless. The worry is when we desperately need someone to put a broom through the club, Gourlays first decision was to appoint Bruce without even considering another candidate which probably means he will be here in August.