West Brom Dot Com

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: Tony Pulis
« Last post by geoff on Today at 12:40:29 AM »
I agree the article, probably 12 months old but the subject matter says a lot

!2 months 12 years the article is has valid now has it was then.
2
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: Tony Pulis
« Last post by adamw1109 on Yesterday at 10:38:41 PM »
....and we added Phillips and Chadli....almost sick of saying it but the point still stands, we played well up to the point of Phillips' injury. With him out we were back to the lack of pace and creativity (oh and the lack of strikers).

One man don't make a team.

People can't keep blaming not having Phillips in the squad for how dire and embarrassing we were some games.
3
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: Tony Pulis
« Last post by Adder on Yesterday at 10:00:22 PM »
....and we added Phillips and Chadli....almost sick of saying it but the point still stands, we played well up to the point of Phillips' injury. With him out we were back to the lack of pace and creativity (oh and the lack of strikers).
4
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: Tony Pulis
« Last post by caravanc58 on Yesterday at 09:52:44 PM »
The messages at the bottom of the article just endorses it for me why things under Pulis will never change, quotes saying wait till we get an attacking midfielder or judge Pulis after the next transfer window (2016) when he's added pace and creativity upfront
or Leko will see us playing more attractive football and if we got rid of Pulis we could do a Charlton.
12 months on and we could say nothings changed and unlikely to.
still need an attacking midfielder
still need pace and creativity upfront
more chance of seeing a comet than Leko on the pitch
Pulis is not the only manager capable of keeping WBA in the Premier League.
5
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: Tony Pulis
« Last post by geoff on Yesterday at 09:16:51 PM »
I agree the article, probably 12 months old but the subject matter says a lot

12 months or 12 years the article is has valid now has it was then.
6
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: Something smells.....
« Last post by WBAinDEVON on Yesterday at 09:02:00 PM »
Looks like you won't be attending much then if sky have it their way!



That's quite funny because we are last on sky's list
7
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: Something smells.....
« Last post by adamw1109 on Yesterday at 08:42:59 PM »
Even though I refuse to renew after many years I will still pick and choose Saturday 3 pm games only. I am not looking forward to this season I must say

Looks like you won't be attending much then if sky have it their way!
8
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: Something smells.....
« Last post by WBAinDEVON on Yesterday at 08:41:48 PM »
Even though I refuse to renew after many years I will still pick and choose Saturday 3 pm games only. I am not looking forward to this season I must say
9
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: New Kit/ Sponsors
« Last post by NathWBA on Yesterday at 08:00:00 PM »

The only ones really affected would be Spurs Stoke Southampton  and Swansea. We [can] wear the home kit in away matches against the others.
id imagine we may clash with Brighton and Huddersfield too
10
West Bromwich Albion FC / Re: New Kit/ Sponsors
« Last post by TheJacko2000 on Yesterday at 07:37:07 PM »
I might be wrong but won't a red and white away kit will clash with Stoke,Southampton,Arsenal, Spurs, Swansea and possibly Man Utd, Liverpool?


The only ones really affected would be Spurs Stoke Southampton  and Swansea. We [can] wear the home kit in away matches against the others.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10